more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19005

[filed under theme 19. Language / F. Communication / 3. Denial ]

Full Idea

The idea that negation is, or can be, a cancellation device raises an interesting question. What does one do to wipe the slate clean after an improper assertion? Not-A is too strong; it reverses our stand on A rather than nullifying it.

Gist of Idea

Not-A is too strong to just erase an improper assertion, because it actually reverses A

Source

Stephen Yablo (Aboutness [2014], 09.8)

Book Ref

Yablo,Stephen: 'Aboutness' [Princeton 2014], p.162


A Reaction

[He is discussing a remark of Strawson 1952] It seems that 'not' has two meanings or uses: a weak use of 'nullifying' an assertion, and a strong use of 'reversing' an assertion. One could do both: 'that's not right; in fact, it's just the opposite'.


The 33 ideas from Stephen Yablo

If sentences point to different evidence, they must have different subject-matter [Yablo]
Sentence-meaning is the truth-conditions - plus factors responsible for them [Yablo]
The content of an assertion can be quite different from compositional content [Yablo]
A statement S is 'partly true' if it has some wholly true parts [Yablo]
Truth-conditions as subject-matter has problems of relevance, short cut, and reversal [Yablo]
Parthood lacks the restriction of kind which most relations have [Yablo]
y is only a proper part of x if there is a z which 'makes up the difference' between them [Yablo]
'Pegasus doesn't exist' is false without Pegasus, yet the absence of Pegasus is its truthmaker [Yablo]
A nominalist can assert statements about mathematical objects, as being partly true [Yablo]
Most people say nonblack nonravens do confirm 'all ravens are black', but only a tiny bit [Yablo]
Gettier says you don't know if you are confused about how it is true [Yablo]
Not-A is too strong to just erase an improper assertion, because it actually reverses A [Yablo]
An 'enthymeme' is an argument with an indispensable unstated assumption [Yablo]
A theory need not be true to be good; it should just be true about its physical aspects [Yablo]
Concrete objects have few essential properties, but properties of abstractions are mostly essential [Yablo]
We are thought to know concreta a posteriori, and many abstracta a priori [Yablo]
Putting numbers in quantifiable position (rather than many quantifiers) makes expression easier [Yablo]
Mathematics is both necessary and a priori because it really consists of logical truths [Yablo]
Philosophers keep finding unexpected objects, like models, worlds, functions, numbers, events, sets, properties [Yablo]
The main modal logics disagree over three key formulae [Yablo]
Platonic objects are really created as existential metaphors [Yablo]
Hardly a word in the language is devoid of metaphorical potential [Yablo]
We quantify over events, worlds, etc. in order to make logical possibilities clearer [Yablo]
We must treat numbers as existing in order to express ourselves about the arrangement of planets [Yablo]
If 'the number of Democrats is on the rise', does that mean that 50 million is on the rise? [Yablo]
A sentence should be recarved to reveal its content or implication relations [Yablo]
Governing possible worlds theory is the fiction that if something is possible, it happens in a world [Yablo]
Fictionalism allows that simulated beliefs may be tracking real facts [Yablo]
A statue is essentially the statue, but its lump is not essentially a statue, so statue isn't lump [Yablo, by Rocca]
For me, fictions are internally true, without a significant internal or external truth-value [Yablo]
Make-believe can help us to reason about facts and scientific procedures [Yablo]
'The clouds are angry' can only mean '...if one were attributing emotions to clouds' [Yablo]
An infinite series of sentences asserting falsehood produces the paradox without self-reference [Yablo, by Sorensen]