more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19059

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / I. Semantics of Logic / 1. Semantics of Logic ]

Full Idea

Nothing is lost, on this view, if in the standard semantic treatment of classical sentential logic, we replace the standard truth-values 'true' and 'false' by the numbers 0 and 1.

Gist of Idea

In standard views you could replace 'true' and 'false' with mere 0 and 1

Source

Michael Dummett (The Justification of Deduction [1973], p.294)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Truth and Other Enigmas' [Duckworth 1978], p.294


A Reaction

[A long context will explain 'on this view'] He is discussing the relationship of syntactic and semantic consequence, and goes on to criticise simple binary truth-table accounts of connectives. Semantics on a computer would just be 0 and 1.

Related Ideas

Idea 19058 Syntactic consequence is positive, for validity; semantic version is negative, with counterexamples [Dummett]

Idea 3192 Basic logic can be done by syntax, with no semantics [Gödel, by Rey]


The 11 ideas from 'The Justification of Deduction'

Deduction is justified by the semantics of its metalanguage [Dummett, by Hanna]
Syntactic consequence is positive, for validity; semantic version is negative, with counterexamples [Dummett]
In standard views you could replace 'true' and 'false' with mere 0 and 1 [Dummett]
Truth-tables are dubious in some cases, and may be a bad way to explain connective meaning [Dummett]
An explanation is often a deduction, but that may well beg the question [Dummett]
Classical two-valued semantics implies that meaning is grasped through truth-conditions [Dummett]
Beth trees show semantics for intuitionistic logic, in terms of how truth has been established [Dummett]
Holism is not a theory of meaning; it is the denial that a theory of meaning is possible [Dummett]
Soundness and completeness proofs test the theory of meaning, rather than the logic theory [Dummett]
Philosophy aims to understand the world, through ordinary experience and science [Dummett]
A successful proof requires recognition of truth at every step [Dummett]