more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19077

[filed under theme 3. Truth / D. Coherence Truth / 1. Coherence Truth ]

Full Idea

It is unsatisfactory for the coherence relation to be consistency, because two propositions could be consistent with a 'specified set', and yet be inconsistent with each other. That would imply they are both true, which is impossible.

Gist of Idea

Two propositions could be consistent with your set, but inconsistent with one another

Source

James O. Young (The Coherence Theory of Truth [2013], §1)

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.1


A Reaction

I'm not convinced by this. You first accept P because it is consistent with the set; then Q turns up, which is consistent with everything in the set except P. So you have to choose between them, and might eject P. Your set was too small.


The 23 ideas with the same theme [truth is when propositions effectively fit together]:

All items of possible human knowledge are interconnected, and can be reached by inference [Descartes]
Everything in the universe is interconnected, so potentially a mind could know everything [Leibniz]
The true is the whole [Hegel]
Truth is a relation to a whole of organised knowledge in the collection of rational minds [Green,TH, by Muirhead]
Judgements can't be true and known in isolation; the only surety is in connections and relations [Nietzsche]
Ideas are true in so far as they co-ordinate our experiences [James]
New opinions count as 'true' if they are assimilated to an individual's current beliefs [James]
Truth is conceivability, or the systematic coherence of a significant whole [Joachim]
The coherence theory says falsehood is failure to cohere, and truth is fitting into a complete system of Truth [Russell]
Coherence tests for truth without implying correspondence, so truth is not correspondence [Blanshard, by Young,JO]
Coherence with a set of propositions suggests we can know the proposition corresponds [Davidson, by Donnellan]
Coherence truth says a consistent set of sentences is true - which ties truth to belief [Davidson]
Rescher says that if coherence requires mutual entailment, this leads to massive logical redundancy [Dancy,J]
If one theory is held to be true, all the other theories appear false, because they can't be added to the true one [Dancy,J]
Coherence needs positive links, not just absence of conflict [Williams,M]
Justification needs coherence, while truth might be ideal coherence [Williams,M]
Truth in a scenario is the negation in that scenario being a priori incoherent [Chalmers]
The coherence theory says truth is an internal relationship between groups of truth-bearers [Engel]
The coherence theory says truth is coherence of thoughts, and not about objects [Button]
Coherence theories differ over the coherence relation, and over the set of proposition with which to cohere [Young,JO]
Two propositions could be consistent with your set, but inconsistent with one another [Young,JO]
Coherence with actual beliefs, or our best beliefs, or ultimate ideal beliefs? [Young,JO]
Coherent truth is not with an arbitrary set of beliefs, but with a set which people actually do believe [Young,JO]