more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19090

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 7. Despair over Philosophy ]

Full Idea

If we cannot check our language against non-linguistic awareness, then philosophy can never be more than a discussion of the utility and compatibility of beliefs - and, more particularly, of the various vocabularies in which those beliefs are formulated.

Gist of Idea

If we can't check our language against experience, philosophy is just comparing beliefs and words

Source

Richard Rorty (Brandom on Social Practices and Representations [1998], iii.127), quoted by Danielle Macbeth - Pragmatism and Objective Truth p.178

Book Ref

'New Pragmatists', ed/tr. Misak,Cheryl [OUP 2009], p.178


A Reaction

I'm amazed at how many people I encounter in philosophy circles (compared with none at all outside those circles) who seem to think that we cannot check our language against our non-linguistic awareness. Rorty is their guru. Weird.


The 16 ideas from Richard Rorty

If we can't check our language against experience, philosophy is just comparing beliefs and words [Rorty]
Rorty seems to view truth as simply being able to hold one's view against all comers [Rorty, by O'Grady]
For James truth is "what it is better for us to believe" rather than a correct picture of reality [Rorty]
If knowledge is merely justified belief, justification is social [Rorty]
Pain lacks intentionality; beliefs lack qualia [Rorty]
Is intentionality a special sort of function? [Rorty]
The mind is a property, or it is baffling [Rorty]
Rational certainty may be victory in argument rather than knowledge of facts [Rorty]
Analytical philosophy seems to have little interest in how to tell a good analysis from a bad one [Rorty]
Since Hegel we have tended to see a human as merely animal if it is outside a society [Rorty]
Davidson's theory of meaning focuses not on terms, but on relations between sentences [Rorty]
Can meanings remain the same when beliefs change? [Rorty]
A theory of reference seems needed to pick out objects without ghostly inner states [Rorty]
Nature has no preferred way of being represented [Rorty]
You can't debate about whether to have higher standards for the application of words [Rorty]
Knowing has no definable essence, but is a social right, found in the context of conversations [Rorty]