more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19094

[filed under theme 3. Truth / E. Pragmatic Truth / 1. Pragmatic Truth ]

Full Idea

For pragmatists there is an unseverable connection between making an assertion and claiming that it is true. ...Were we to get to a belief that is forever assertible...then we would have a true belief. There is nothing higher or better we could ask of it.

Gist of Idea

For pragmatists the loftiest idea of truth is just a feature of what remains forever assertible

Source

Cheryl Misak (Pragmatism and Deflationism [2007], 1)

Book Ref

'New Pragmatists', ed/tr. Misak,Cheryl [OUP 2009], p.69


A Reaction

She is particularly drawing on Peirce. She says his 'ideal end of enquiry' idea is a small aspect of his view of truth, which is mainly given here. I had taken the pragmatic view of truth to be silly, but I may rethink.


The 12 ideas from 'Pragmatism and Deflationism'

For pragmatists the loftiest idea of truth is just a feature of what remains forever assertible [Misak]
Truth makes disagreements matter, or worth settling [Misak]
'True' is used for emphasis, clarity, assertion, comparison, objectivity, meaning, negation, consequence... [Misak]
Deflating the correspondence theory doesn't entail deflating all the other theories [Misak]
Disquotation is bivalent [Misak]
Disquotationalism resembles a telephone directory [Misak]
Deflationism isn't a theory of truth, but an account of its role in natural language [Misak]
'That's true' doesn't just refer back to a sentence, but implies sustained evidence for it [Misak]
Truth isn't a grand elusive property, if it is just the aim of our assertions and inquiries [Misak]
The anti-realism debate concerns whether indefeasibility is a plausible aim of inquiry [Misak]
Disquotations says truth is assertion, and assertion proclaims truth - but what is 'assertion'? [Misak]
Truth is proper assertion, but that has varying standards [Misak]