more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19098

[filed under theme 3. Truth / H. Deflationary Truth / 2. Deflationary Truth ]

Full Idea

We must not move seamlessly from the thought that the correspondence theory must be deflated to the thought that any theory of truth must be deflated.

Gist of Idea

Deflating the correspondence theory doesn't entail deflating all the other theories

Source

Cheryl Misak (Pragmatism and Deflationism [2007], 2)

Book Ref

'New Pragmatists', ed/tr. Misak,Cheryl [OUP 2009], p.73


A Reaction

This rather good essay offers the idea that Peircean pragmatic approaches to truth can meet the deflationary desires of the opponents of correspondence, without jettisoning all the crucial naturalistic connections with reality. Interesting.


The 12 ideas from 'Pragmatism and Deflationism'

For pragmatists the loftiest idea of truth is just a feature of what remains forever assertible [Misak]
Truth makes disagreements matter, or worth settling [Misak]
'True' is used for emphasis, clarity, assertion, comparison, objectivity, meaning, negation, consequence... [Misak]
Deflating the correspondence theory doesn't entail deflating all the other theories [Misak]
Disquotation is bivalent [Misak]
Disquotationalism resembles a telephone directory [Misak]
Deflationism isn't a theory of truth, but an account of its role in natural language [Misak]
'That's true' doesn't just refer back to a sentence, but implies sustained evidence for it [Misak]
Truth isn't a grand elusive property, if it is just the aim of our assertions and inquiries [Misak]
The anti-realism debate concerns whether indefeasibility is a plausible aim of inquiry [Misak]
Disquotations says truth is assertion, and assertion proclaims truth - but what is 'assertion'? [Misak]
Truth is proper assertion, but that has varying standards [Misak]