more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19100

[filed under theme 3. Truth / E. Pragmatic Truth / 1. Pragmatic Truth ]

Full Idea

The role of truth is to make disagreements matter, or to make sense of wanting to resolve disagreements.

Gist of Idea

Truth makes disagreements matter, or worth settling

Source

Cheryl Misak (Pragmatism and Deflationism [2007], 2)

Book Ref

'New Pragmatists', ed/tr. Misak,Cheryl [OUP 2009], p.74


A Reaction

[She cites Huw Price 2003] This suggests that the most important use of 'truth' is forensic. It is hard to make any sense of a law court without a robust sense of truth. Trial by jury, rather than some great personage, shows this value.


The 13 ideas from Cheryl Misak

Modern pragmatism sees objectivity as possible, despite its gradual evolution [Misak]
For pragmatists the loftiest idea of truth is just a feature of what remains forever assertible [Misak]
'True' is used for emphasis, clarity, assertion, comparison, objectivity, meaning, negation, consequence... [Misak]
Deflating the correspondence theory doesn't entail deflating all the other theories [Misak]
Truth makes disagreements matter, or worth settling [Misak]
Disquotation is bivalent [Misak]
Disquotationalism resembles a telephone directory [Misak]
'That's true' doesn't just refer back to a sentence, but implies sustained evidence for it [Misak]
Truth isn't a grand elusive property, if it is just the aim of our assertions and inquiries [Misak]
Deflationism isn't a theory of truth, but an account of its role in natural language [Misak]
The anti-realism debate concerns whether indefeasibility is a plausible aim of inquiry [Misak]
Truth is proper assertion, but that has varying standards [Misak]
Disquotations says truth is assertion, and assertion proclaims truth - but what is 'assertion'? [Misak]