more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19270

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 10. Denial of Meanings ]

Full Idea

What can there be in my mind that I make use of when I follow a general rule to add in the future? It seems that the entire idea of meaning vanishes into thin air.

Gist of Idea

If you ask what is in your mind for following the addition rule, meaning just seems to vanish

Source

Saul A. Kripke (Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language [1982], 2)

Book Ref

Kripke,Saul: 'Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language' [Blackwell 1993], p.22


A Reaction

Introspection probably isn't the best way to investigate the phenomenon of meaning. Indeed it seems rather old-fashioned and Cartesian. Kripke says, though, that seeking 'tacit' rules is even worse [end of note 22].


The 14 ideas with the same theme [doubts about the whole idea of meaning]:

If words can't be defined, they may just be the chirruping of chicks [Zhuangzi (Chuang Tzu)]
If you are not certain of any fact, you cannot be certain of the meaning of your words either [Wittgenstein]
We don't have 'meanings' in our minds in addition to verbal expressions [Wittgenstein]
Make the following experiment: say "It's cold here" and mean "It's warm here" [Wittgenstein]
The word 'meaning' is only useful when talking about significance or about synonymy [Quine]
I do not believe there is some abstract entity called a 'meaning' which we can 'have' [Quine]
Intensions are creatures of darkness which should be exorcised [Quine]
Once meaning and reference are separated, meaning ceases to seem important [Quine]
Meaning is essence divorced from things and wedded to words [Quine]
Holism is not a theory of meaning; it is the denial that a theory of meaning is possible [Dummett]
Words exist in 'spacing', so meanings are never synchronic except in writing [Derrida]
Kripke's Wittgenstein says meaning 'vanishes into thin air' [Kripke, by Miller,A]
If you ask what is in your mind for following the addition rule, meaning just seems to vanish [Kripke]
People presume meanings exist because they confuse meaning and reference [Orenstein]