more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19284

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 11. Denial of Necessity ]

Full Idea

To say that we dignify a truth as necessary we are expressing our own mental attitudes - our own inability to make anything of a possible way of thinking which denies it. It is this blank unimaginability which we voice when we use the modal vocabulary.

Gist of Idea

Asserting a necessity just expresses our inability to imagine it is false

Source

Simon Blackburn (Spreading the Word [1984], 6.5)

Book Ref

Blackburn,Simon: 'Spreading the Word' [OUP 1984], p.217


A Reaction

Yes, but why are we unable to imagine it? I accept that the truth or falsity of Goldbach's Conjecture may well be necessary, but I have no imagination one way or the other about it. Philosophers like Blackburn are very alien to me!


The 10 ideas from Simon Blackburn

If we are told the source of necessity, this seems to be a regress if the source is not already necessary [Blackburn]
If something underlies a necessity, is that underlying thing necessary or contingent? [Blackburn, by Hale/Hoffmann,A]
The main objection to intuitionism in ethics is that intuition is a disguise for prejudice or emotion [Blackburn]
Critics of prescriptivism observe that it is consistent to accept an ethical verdict but refuse to be bound by it [Blackburn]
A true belief might be based on a generally reliable process that failed on this occasion [Blackburn]
Visual sense data are an inner picture show which represents the world [Blackburn]
Some philosophers always want more from morality; for others, nature is enough [Blackburn]
The word 'respect' ranges from mere non-interference to the highest levels of reverence [Blackburn]
Akrasia is intelligible in hindsight, when we revisit our previous emotions [Blackburn]
Asserting a necessity just expresses our inability to imagine it is false [Blackburn]