more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Coherence in a view consists in connections of intelligibility among the elements of the view. Among other things these included explanatory connections, which hold when part of one's view makes it intelligible why some other part should be true.
Gist of Idea
Coherence is intelligible connections, especially one element explaining another
Source
Gilbert Harman (Change in View: Principles of Reasoning [1986], 7)
Book Ref
Harman,Gilbert: 'Change in View: Principles of Reasoning' [MIP 1986], p.65
A Reaction
Music to my ears. I call myself an 'explanatory empiricist', and embrace a coherence theory of justification. This is the framework within which philosophy should be practised. Harman is our founder, and Paul Thagard our guru.
19304 | The rules of reasoning are not the rules of logic [Harman] |
19303 | Implication just accumulates conclusions, but inference may also revise our views [Harman] |
19305 | The Gambler's Fallacy (ten blacks, so red is due) overemphasises the early part of a sequence [Harman] |
19308 | We strongly desire to believe what is true, even though logic does not require it [Harman] |
19307 | If there is a great cost to avoiding inconsistency, we learn to reason our way around it [Harman] |
19309 | Logic has little relevance to reasoning, except when logical conclusions are immediate [Harman] |
19306 | It is a principle of reasoning not to clutter your mind with trivialities [Harman] |
19310 | High probability premises need not imply high probability conclusions [Harman] |
19311 | In revision of belief, we need to keep track of justifications for foundations, but not for coherence [Harman] |
19312 | Coherence is intelligible connections, especially one element explaining another [Harman] |