more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19387

[filed under theme 14. Science / C. Induction / 2. Aims of Induction ]

Full Idea

We construct a hypothesis on the basis of an induction, that is on the basis of a comparison of experiences.

Gist of Idea

Hypotheses come from induction, which is comparison of experiences

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (Elements of Law and Justice [1669], p.2)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'Leibniz Selections', ed/tr. Wiener,Philip P. [Scribners 1951], p.2


A Reaction

This fits the traditional positivist picture of science (observe-hypothesise-predict-observe). I like the definition of induction as 'comparison of experiences', because it doesn't reduce it to sequences of objects, and points to coherence.


The 14 ideas with the same theme [possible targets for inductive thinking]:

We learn universals from many particulars [Aristotle]
Science is based on induction, for general truths about fire, rhubarb and magnets [Buridan]
Hypotheses come from induction, which is comparison of experiences [Leibniz]
We assume similar secret powers behind similar experiences, such as the nourishment of bread [Hume]
'Induction' doesn't capture Greek 'epagoge', which is singulars in a mass producing the general [Peirce]
Induction is inferring premises from consequences [Russell]
Induction accepts the simplest law that fits our experiences [Wittgenstein]
The induction problem is to prove generalisations about the future based on the past [Ayer]
Induction passes from particular facts to other particulars, or to general laws, non-deductively [Ayer]
More careful inductions gradually lead to the hypothetico-deductive method [Quine]
Induction is an attempt to increase the coherence of our explanations [Harman]
Induction is just reasonable methods of inferring the unobserved from the observed [Lewis]
Induction must go beyond the evidence, in order to explain why the evidence occurred [Bonjour]
Induction is inference to the best explanation, where the explanation is a law [Bird]