more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19428

[filed under theme 7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 5. Reason for Existence ]

Full Idea

From the very fact that something exists rather than nothing, we recognise that there is in possible things, that is, in the very possibility or essence, a certain exigent need of existence, and, so to speak, some claim to existence.

Gist of Idea

Because something does exist, there must be a drive in possible things towards existence

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (On the Ultimate Origination of Things [1697], p.347)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'Leibniz Selections', ed/tr. Wiener,Philip P. [Scribners 1951], p.347


A Reaction

I love the fact that Leibniz tried to explain why there is something rather than nothing. Bede Rundle and Dale Jacquette are similar heroes. As Leibniz tells us, contradictions have no claim to existence, but non-contradictions do.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [why do things (or anything at all) exist?]:

Nothing could come out of nothing, and existence could never completely cease [Empedocles]
Maybe necessity and non-necessity are the first principles of ontology [Aristotle]
There must always be a reason or cause why some triangle does or does not exist [Spinoza]
Possibles demand existence, so as many of them as possible must actually exist [Leibniz]
God's sufficient reason for choosing reality is in the fitness or perfection of possibilities [Leibniz]
First: there must be reasons; Second: why anything at all?; Third: why this? [Leibniz]
Leibniz first asked 'why is there something rather than nothing?' [Leibniz, by Jacquette]
There must be a straining towards existence in the essence of all possible things [Leibniz]
Because something does exist, there must be a drive in possible things towards existence [Leibniz]
I do not believe in the existence of anything, if I see no reason to believe it [Berkeley]
Hegel gives an ontological proof of the existence of everything [Hegel, by Scruton]
I assume existence, rather than reasoning towards it [Kierkegaard]
Being is maximal consistency [Jacquette]
Existence is completeness and consistency [Jacquette]
It is necessarily contingent that there is one thing rather than another - so something must exist [Meillassoux]
Either p is true or not-p is true, so something is true, so something exists [Liggins]
Current physics says matter and antimatter should have reduced to light at the big bang [New Sci.]
CP violation shows a decay imbalance in matter and antimatter, leading to matter's dominance [New Sci.]