more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19535

[filed under theme 19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 2. Semantics ]

Full Idea

The internalist version of inferentialist semantics has particular difficulty in establishing an adequate relation between meaning and reference.

Gist of Idea

Internalist inferentialism has trouble explaining how meaning and reference relate

Source

Timothy Williamson (Knowledge First (and reply) [2014], p.6)

Book Ref

'Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2nd ed)', ed/tr. Steup/Turri/Sosa [Wiley Blackwell 2014], p.6


A Reaction

I would have thought that this was a big problem for referentialist semantics too, though evidently Williamson doesn't think so. If he is saying that the meaning is in the external world, dream on.

Related Ideas

Idea 19533 Inferentialist semantics relies on internal inference relations, not on external references [Williamson]

Idea 19534 How does inferentialism distinguish the patterns of inference that are essential to meaning? [Williamson]


The 11 ideas from 'Knowledge First (and reply)'

Surely I am acquainted with physical objects, not with appearances? [Williamson]
We don't acquire evidence and then derive some knowledge, because evidence IS knowledge [Williamson]
Knowledge is prior to believing, just as doing is prior to trying to do [Williamson]
Belief explains justification, and knowledge explains belief, so knowledge explains justification [Williamson]
A neutral state of experience, between error and knowledge, is not basic; the successful state is basic [Williamson]
Internalism about mind is an obsolete view, and knowledge-first epistemology develops externalism [Williamson]
How does inferentialism distinguish the patterns of inference that are essential to meaning? [Williamson]
Internalist inferentialism has trouble explaining how meaning and reference relate [Williamson]
Inferentialist semantics relies on internal inference relations, not on external references [Williamson]
Truth-conditional referential semantics is externalist, referring to worldly items [Williamson]
Knowledge-first says your total evidence IS your knowledge [Williamson]