more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 19563

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism ]

Full Idea

On my own view, the context sensivity of knowledge is inherited from one of its components, i.e. justification.

Gist of Idea

The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification

Source

Stewart Cohen (Contextualism Defended (and reply) [2005], 1)

Book Ref

'Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (2nd ed)', ed/tr. Steup/Turri/Sosa [Wiley Blackwell 2014], p.81


A Reaction

That sounds right, and it reinforces the idea that 'justification' is a more important epistemological concept than 'knowledge'. 'Am I justified in believing p?' Answer: 'it depends how well you have researched it'.


The 5 ideas from 'Contextualism Defended (and reply)'

Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate [Cohen,S]
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know [Cohen,S]
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification [Cohen,S]
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts [Cohen,S]
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued [Cohen,S]