more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19662

[filed under theme 7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 5. Reason for Existence ]

Full Idea

It is necessary that there be something rather than nothing because it is necessarily contingent that there is something rather than something else.

Gist of Idea

It is necessarily contingent that there is one thing rather than another - so something must exist

Source

Quentin Meillassoux (After Finitude; the necessity of contingency [2006], 3)

Book Ref

Meillassoux: 'After Finitude: the necessity of contingency', ed/tr. Brassier,R [Bloomsbury 2008], p.76


A Reaction

The great charm of metaphysics is the array of serious answers to the question of why there is something rather than nothing. You'll need to read Meillassoux's book to understand this one.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [why do things (or anything at all) exist?]:

Nothing could come out of nothing, and existence could never completely cease [Empedocles]
Maybe necessity and non-necessity are the first principles of ontology [Aristotle]
There must always be a reason or cause why some triangle does or does not exist [Spinoza]
Possibles demand existence, so as many of them as possible must actually exist [Leibniz]
God's sufficient reason for choosing reality is in the fitness or perfection of possibilities [Leibniz]
First: there must be reasons; Second: why anything at all?; Third: why this? [Leibniz]
Leibniz first asked 'why is there something rather than nothing?' [Leibniz, by Jacquette]
There must be a straining towards existence in the essence of all possible things [Leibniz]
Because something does exist, there must be a drive in possible things towards existence [Leibniz]
I do not believe in the existence of anything, if I see no reason to believe it [Berkeley]
Hegel gives an ontological proof of the existence of everything [Hegel, by Scruton]
I assume existence, rather than reasoning towards it [Kierkegaard]
Being is maximal consistency [Jacquette]
Existence is completeness and consistency [Jacquette]
It is necessarily contingent that there is one thing rather than another - so something must exist [Meillassoux]
Either p is true or not-p is true, so something is true, so something exists [Liggins]
Current physics says matter and antimatter should have reduced to light at the big bang [New Sci.]
CP violation shows a decay imbalance in matter and antimatter, leading to matter's dominance [New Sci.]