more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19709

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 3. Internal or External / b. Pro-externalism ]

Full Idea

The internalist approach in epistemology seems to suggest an over-inellectualized and deliberative picture of our belief-forming activities.

Gist of Idea

Internalism in epistemology over-emphasises deliberation about beliefs

Source

Hamid Vahid (Externalism/Internalism [2011], 2.2 B)

Book Ref

'Routledge Companion to Epistemology', ed/tr. Bernecker,S/Pritchard,D [Routledge 2014], p.150


A Reaction

This strikes me as confused. The question is not how do I arrive at my beliefs but what justifies my believing them, and what justifies the beliefs in themselves? My head is full of daft beliefs produced by TV advertising.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [reasons to favour externalist justifcation]:

If we knew what we know, we would be astonished [Kant]
People's reasons for belief are rarely conscious [Harman]
If justified beliefs are well-formed beliefs, then animals and young children have them [Goldman]
Externalism is better than internalism in dealing with radical scepticism [Pritchard,D]
Internalism in epistemology over-emphasises deliberation about beliefs [Vahid]