more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19734

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / b. Need for justification ]

Full Idea

Why should knowledge be more valuable than true opinion, if their practical value is the same?

Gist of Idea

If value is practical, knowledge is no better than true opinion

Source

John Greco (The Value Problem [2011], Intro)

Book Ref

'Routledge Companion to Epistemology', ed/tr. Bernecker,S/Pritchard,D [Routledge 2014], p.220


A Reaction

We have exam systems and academic titles to bestow social prestige on people who know, not to mention quiz shows. Modern society needs lots of knowledgeable citizens. I'm not sure what intrinsic value knowledge could have.

Related Idea

Idea 1923 As a guide to action, true opinion is as good as knowledge [Plato]


The 12 ideas with the same theme [why knowledge needs justification]:

As a guide to action, true opinion is as good as knowledge [Plato]
True belief without knowledge is like blind people on the right road [Plato]
True opinion without reason is midway between wisdom and ignorance [Plato]
An inadequate rational account would still not justify knowledge [Plato]
To know something we need understanding, which is grasp of the primary cause [Aristotle]
Fools, infants and madmen may speak truly, but do not know [Sext.Empiricus]
Believing without a reason may just be love of your own fantasies [Locke]
Justification is neither sufficient nor necessary for knowledge [Lewis]
What we want to know is - when is it all right to believe something? [Pollock]
If value is practical, knowledge is no better than true opinion [Greco]
Many philosophers rate justification as a more important concept than knowledge [Bird]
If knowledge is unanalysable, that makes justification more important [Dougherty/Rysiew]