more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19930

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / B. Nature of a State / 2. State Legitimacy / a. Sovereignty ]

Full Idea

Either there is no sovereignty nor any right over subjects, or else sovereignty must necessarily extend to everything that might be effective in inducing men to submit to it.

Gist of Idea

Sovereignty must include the power to make people submit to it

Source

Baruch de Spinoza (Tractatus Theologico-Politicus [1670], 17.02)

Book Ref

Spinoza,Benedict de: 'Theological-Political Treatise', ed/tr. Israel,Jonathan [CUP 2007], p.209


A Reaction

In the seventeenth century this usually includes the death penalty. Refusal to submit may be fairly passive and harmless, so the issue must concern duties, rather than rights. Taxes, jury duty, calls to arms.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [rightful power over citizens]:

Hobbes says the people voluntarily give up their sovereignty, in a contract with a ruler [Hobbes, by Oksala]
Sovereignty must include the power to make people submit to it [Spinoza]
People accept the right to be commanded, because they themselves wish to command [Rousseau]
Rousseau insists that popular sovereignty needs a means of expressing consent [Rousseau, by Oksala]
Sovereignty is the exercise of the general will, which can never be delegated [Rousseau]
Just as people control their limbs, the general-will state has total control of its members [Rousseau]
Political laws are fundamental, as they firmly organise the state - but they could still be changed [Rousseau]
The sovereignty does not appoint the leaders [Rousseau]
States only have full authority if they heed the claims of human fellowship [Green,TH]
Liberal state legitimacy is based on a belief in justice, not in some conception of the good life [Kymlicka]
Nowadays sovereignty (once the basis of a state) has become relative [Reybrouck]
Unjust institutions may be seen as just; are they legitimate if just but seen as unjust? [Tuckness/Wolf]