more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20201

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / C. Virtue Theory / 1. Virtue Theory / a. Nature of virtue ]

Full Idea

The difference between skills and virtues is that virtues must be enacted, are always desirable, can't be forgotten, and can be simulated, whereas skills are very specific, involve a technique, lack contraries, and lack intrinsic value.

Gist of Idea

Eight marks distingush skills from virtues

Source

report of Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski (Virtues of the Mind [1996], II 2.4) by PG - Db (ideas)

Book Ref

Zagzebski,Linda: 'Virtues of the Mind' [CUP 1996], p.107


A Reaction

[my summary of her II 2.4 discussion of the differences] She observes that Aristotle made insufficient effort to distinguish the two. It may be obscure to say that virtues go 'deeper' than skills, but we all know what is meant. 'Skills serve virtues'.


The 34 ideas from Linda Trinkaus Zagzebski

Unlike knowledge, wisdom cannot be misused [Zagzebski]
Epistemic perfection for reliabilism is a truth-producing machine [Zagzebski]
Modern epistemology is too atomistic, and neglects understanding [Zagzebski]
Some beliefs are fairly voluntary, and others are not at all so [Zagzebski]
Moral luck means our praise and blame may exceed our control or awareness [Zagzebski]
Intellectual virtues are forms of moral virtue [Zagzebski]
Virtue theory is hopeless if there is no core of agreed universal virtues [Zagzebski]
Nowadays we doubt the Greek view that the flourishing of individuals and communities are linked [Zagzebski]
The courage of an evil person is still a quality worth having [Zagzebski]
A virtue must always have a corresponding vice [Zagzebski]
Eight marks distingush skills from virtues [Zagzebski, by PG]
Motives involve desires, but also how the desires connect to our aims [Zagzebski]
Virtues are deep acquired excellences of persons, which successfully attain desire ends [Zagzebski]
Every moral virtue requires a degree of intelligence [Zagzebski]
The feeling accompanying curiosity is neither pleasant nor painful [Zagzebski]
Intellectual and moral prejudice are the same vice (and there are other examples) [Zagzebski]
We can name at least thirteen intellectual vices [Zagzebski]
For the virtue of honesty you must be careful with the truth, and not just speak truly [Zagzebski]
A reliable process is no use without the virtues to make use of them [Zagzebski]
We need phronesis to coordinate our virtues [Zagzebski]
Virtue theory can have lots of rules, as long as they are grounded in virtues and in facts [Zagzebski]
A justified belief emulates the understanding and beliefs of an intellectually virtuous person [Zagzebski]
Modern moral theory concerns settling conflicts, rather than human fulfilment [Zagzebski]
The self is known as much by its knowledge as by its action [Zagzebski]
Truth is valuable, but someone knowing the truth is more valuable [Zagzebski]
Knowledge either aims at a quantity of truths, or a quality of understanding of truths [Zagzebski]
Precision is only one of the virtues of a good definition [Zagzebski]
Objection by counterexample is weak, because it only reveals inaccuracies in one theory [Zagzebski]
Epistemology is excessively atomic, by focusing on justification instead of understanding [Zagzebski]
For internalists Gettier situations are where internally it is fine, but there is an external mishap [Zagzebski]
Gettier problems are always possible if justification and truth are not closely linked [Zagzebski]
We avoid the Gettier problem if the support for the belief entails its truth [Zagzebski]
Gettier cases arise when good luck cancels out bad luck [Zagzebski]
Wisdom is the property of a person, not of their cognitive state [Zagzebski, by Whitcomb]