more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20283

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / F. Life Issues / 6. Animal Rights ]

Full Idea

It seems that killing a chimpanzee is worse than the killing of a gravely defective human who is not a person. ...[p.103] the effects on relatives of the defective human will sometimes constitute additional indirect reasons against killing the human.

Gist of Idea

Killing a chimp is worse than killing a human too defective to be a person

Source

Peter Singer (Practical Ethics [1979], 05)

Book Ref

Singer,Peter: 'Practical Ethics' [CUP 1989], p.97


A Reaction

Singer's most notorious idea. Perhaps we should all carry cards (perhaps combined with donor cards) saying how many people will care if we die.


The 14 ideas from 'Practical Ethics'

Conflict of rules might be avoided by greater complexity, or by a hierarchy of rules [Singer]
'Marginal utility' says something is more useful if it is in short supply [Singer]
Equality of interests is a minimal principle, not implying equal treatment [Singer]
Equality of opportunity unfairly rewards those lucky enough to have great ability [Singer]
Why should I do anything for posterity? What has posterity ever done for me? [Singer]
The sanctity of a human life depends either on being of our species, or on being a person [Singer]
Killing a chimp is worse than killing a human too defective to be a person [Singer]
Why should a potential person have the rights of an actual person? [Singer]
If a right entails having the relevant desire, many creatures might have no right to life [Singer]
Following an inner voice for morality is irresponsible in a rational agent [Singer]
You can't condemn violent revolution without assessing the evils it prevents [Singer]
If 49% of the population can be wrong, so can 51% [Singer]
Psychopaths may just be bored, because they cannot participate in normal emotional life [Singer]
Ethics is universalisable - it must involve an impartial and universal view of things [Singer]