more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20284

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / F. Life Issues / 3. Abortion ]

Full Idea

A prince may be a potential king, but he does not have the rights of a king. Why should a potential person have the rights of a person?

Gist of Idea

Why should a potential person have the rights of an actual person?

Source

Peter Singer (Practical Ethics [1979], 06)

Book Ref

Singer,Peter: 'Practical Ethics' [CUP 1989], p.120


A Reaction

But the prince is probably accorded special rights, merely on the grounds that he is the potential king. An unborn potential king is always considered as special.


The 14 ideas from 'Practical Ethics'

Conflict of rules might be avoided by greater complexity, or by a hierarchy of rules [Singer]
'Marginal utility' says something is more useful if it is in short supply [Singer]
Equality of interests is a minimal principle, not implying equal treatment [Singer]
Equality of opportunity unfairly rewards those lucky enough to have great ability [Singer]
Why should I do anything for posterity? What has posterity ever done for me? [Singer]
The sanctity of a human life depends either on being of our species, or on being a person [Singer]
Killing a chimp is worse than killing a human too defective to be a person [Singer]
Why should a potential person have the rights of an actual person? [Singer]
If a right entails having the relevant desire, many creatures might have no right to life [Singer]
Following an inner voice for morality is irresponsible in a rational agent [Singer]
You can't condemn violent revolution without assessing the evils it prevents [Singer]
If 49% of the population can be wrong, so can 51% [Singer]
Psychopaths may just be bored, because they cannot participate in normal emotional life [Singer]
Ethics is universalisable - it must involve an impartial and universal view of things [Singer]