more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
Quine argues that logic could not be established by conventions, since the logical truths, being infinite in number, must be given by general conventions rather than singly; and logic is needed in the meta-theory, to apply to individual cases.
Gist of Idea
Logic needs general conventions, but that needs logic to apply them to individual cases
Source
report of Willard Quine (Truth by Convention [1935]) by Georges Rey - The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction 3.4
Book Ref
'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.7
A Reaction
A helpful insight into Quine's claim. If only someone would print these one sentence summaries at the top of classic papers, we would all get far more out of them at first reading. Assuming Rey is right!
20296 | Logic needs general conventions, but that needs logic to apply them to individual cases [Quine, by Rey] |
8998 | Claims that logic and mathematics are conventional are either empty, uninteresting, or false [Quine] |
8999 | Logic isn't conventional, because logic is needed to infer logic from conventions [Quine] |
9000 | If a convention cannot be communicated until after its adoption, what is its role? [Quine] |
10064 | Quine quickly dismisses If-thenism [Quine, by Musgrave] |
8993 | If mathematics follows from definitions, then it is conventional, and part of logic [Quine] |
8994 | If analytic geometry identifies figures with arithmetical relations, logicism can include geometry [Quine] |
8995 | Definition by words is determinate but relative; fixing contexts could make it absolute [Quine] |
8996 | If if time is money then if time is not money then time is money then if if if time is not money... [Quine] |
8997 | There are four different possible conventional accounts of geometry [Quine] |