more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20296

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / C. Ontology of Logic / 4. Logic by Convention ]

Full Idea

Quine argues that logic could not be established by conventions, since the logical truths, being infinite in number, must be given by general conventions rather than singly; and logic is needed in the meta-theory, to apply to individual cases.

Gist of Idea

Logic needs general conventions, but that needs logic to apply them to individual cases

Source

report of Willard Quine (Truth by Convention [1935]) by Georges Rey - The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction 3.4

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.7


A Reaction

A helpful insight into Quine's claim. If only someone would print these one sentence summaries at the top of classic papers, we would all get far more out of them at first reading. Assuming Rey is right!


The 10 ideas from 'Truth by Convention'

Logic needs general conventions, but that needs logic to apply them to individual cases [Quine, by Rey]
Claims that logic and mathematics are conventional are either empty, uninteresting, or false [Quine]
Logic isn't conventional, because logic is needed to infer logic from conventions [Quine]
If a convention cannot be communicated until after its adoption, what is its role? [Quine]
Quine quickly dismisses If-thenism [Quine, by Musgrave]
If mathematics follows from definitions, then it is conventional, and part of logic [Quine]
If analytic geometry identifies figures with arithmetical relations, logicism can include geometry [Quine]
Definition by words is determinate but relative; fixing contexts could make it absolute [Quine]
If if time is money then if time is not money then time is money then if if if time is not money... [Quine]
There are four different possible conventional accounts of geometry [Quine]