more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Everything of which we become conscious is a terminal phenomenon, an end - and causes nothing.
Gist of Idea
Consciousness is a terminal phenomenon, and causes nothing
Source
Friedrich Nietzsche (The Will to Power (notebooks) [1888], §478)
Book Ref
Nietzsche,Friedrich: 'The Will to Power', ed/tr. Kaufmann,W /Hollingdate,R [Vintage 1968], p.265
A Reaction
This appears to endorse epiphenomenalism - which I take to be an incoherent concept. How can becoming fully aware of something, rather than subliminally or subconsciously aware, make no difference at all? If it exists, it has causal powers.
3157 | T.H.Huxley gave the earliest clear statement of epiphenomenalism [Huxley, by Rey] |
3154 | Brain causes mind, but it doesn't seem that mind causes actions [Huxley] |
20374 | Consciousness is a terminal phenomenon, and causes nothing [Nietzsche] |
14494 | Epiphenomenalism is like a pointless nobleman, kept for show, but soon to be abolished [Alexander,S] |
3398 | Epiphenomenalism makes the mind totally pointless [Alexander,S] |
3399 | If epiphenomenalism were true, we couldn't report consciousness [Kim] |
4891 | If epiphenomenalism just says mental events are effects but not causes, it is consistent with physicalism [Perry] |
7379 | If an epiphenomenon has no physical effects, it has to be undetectable [Dennett] |
2599 | Either intentionality causes things, or epiphenomenalism is true [Fodor] |
7860 | The epiphenomenal relation of mind and brain is a 'causal dangler', unlike anything else [Papineau] |
7862 | Maybe minds do not cause actions, but do cause us to report our decisions [Papineau] |
4074 | Functionalism defines mental states by their causal properties, which rules out epiphenomenalism [Crane] |
6625 | If qualia are causally inert, how can we even know about them? [Lowe] |