more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20407

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 3. Taste ]

Full Idea

Taste is the faculty for judging an object or a kind of representation through a satisfaction or a dissatisfaction, ...where the object of such a satisfaction is called beautiful.

Gist of Idea

Taste is the capacity to judge an object or representation which is thought to be beautiful

Source

report of Alfred Tarski (The Concept of Truth for Formalized Languages [1933]) by Elizabeth Schellekens - Immanuel Kant (aesthetics) 1

Book Ref

'Key Thinkers in Aesthetics', ed/tr. Giovannelli,Alessandro [Continuum 2012], p.62


A Reaction

We usually avoid the word 'faculty' nowadays, because it implies a specific mechanism, but 'capacity' will do. Kant is said to focus specifically on beauty, whereas modern aestheticians have a broader view of the type of subject matter.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [nature and status of good taste]:

If would be absurd not to disagree with someone's taste if it was a taste for poisons [Leibniz]
Strong sense, delicate sentiment, practice, comparisons, and lack of prejudice, are all needed for good taste [Hume]
There are axioms of taste - such as a general consensus about a beautiful face [Reid]
With respect to the senses, taste is an entirely personal matter [Kant]
When we judge beauty, it isn't just personal; we judge on behalf of everybody [Kant]
Saying everyone has their own taste destroys the very idea of taste [Kant]
Why are the strong tastes of other people so contagious? [Nietzsche]
Taste is the capacity to judge an object or representation which is thought to be beautiful [Tarski, by Schellekens]
Literary meaning emerges in comparisons, and tradition shows which comparisons are relevant [Scruton]
Critics must be causally entangled with their subject matter [Fogelin]
The faculty of 'taste' was posited to explain why only some people had aesthetic appreciation [Davies,S]