more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20426

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / C. Artistic Issues / 7. Art and Morality ]

Full Idea

To the pure moralist, accepting nothing but ethical values, to be justified, the life of the imagination must be shown not only not to hinder but actually to forward right action, otherwise it is not only useless but, by absorbing energies, harmful.

Gist of Idea

For pure moralists art must promote right action, and not just be harmless

Source

Roger Fry (An Essay in Aesthetics [1909], p.26)

Book Ref

Fry,Roger: 'Vision and Design' [Penguin 1937], p.26


A Reaction

I think this is the sort of attitude you find in Samuel Johnson. Puritans even reject light music, which seems pleasantly harmless to the rest of us. 'Absorbing energies' doesn't sound much of an objection, and may not be the actual objection.


The 39 ideas with the same theme [relationship between moral and aesthetic values]:

Musical performance can reveal a range of virtues [Damon of Ath.]
What is fine is the parent of goodness [Plato]
If the King likes music then there is hope for the state [Mengzi (Mencius)]
The good is found in actions, but beauty can exist without movement [Aristotle]
Music can mould the character to be virtuous (just as gymnastics trains the body) [Aristotle]
Stoics say that beauty and goodness are equivalent and linked [Chrysippus, by Diog. Laertius]
Stoics use 'kalon' (beautiful) as a synonym for 'agathon' (good) [Bury on Stoic school]
Beauty motivates morality, by harmonising feeling and reason [Schiller, by Pinkard]
People estimate art according to their moral values [Tolstoy]
The upper classes put beauty first, and thus freed themselves from morality [Tolstoy]
We separate the concept of beauty from goodness, unlike the ancients [Tolstoy]
Books are only well or badly written, not moral or immoral [Wilde]
Having ethical sympathies is a bad mannerism of style in an artist [Wilde]
For pure moralists art must promote right action, and not just be harmless [Fry]
Only artistic qualities matter in art, because they also have the highest moral value [Bell,C]
Those who say immorality is not an aesthetic criterion must show that all criteria are aesthetic [Weil]
Appreciating beauty in art or nature opens up the good life, by restricting selfishness [Murdoch]
Art and morals are essentially the same, and are both identical with love [Murdoch]
Because art is love, it improves us morally [Murdoch]
The Aristotelian idea that choices can be perceived needs literary texts to expound it [Nussbaum]
Interesting art is always organised around ethical demands [Critchley]
'Autonomism' says the morality is irrelevant to the aesthetics [Jacobson,D]
Moral defects of art can be among its aesthetic virtues [Jacobson,D]
Audiences can be too moral [Jacobson,D]
Immoral art encourages immoral emotions [Jacobson,D]
Moderate moralism says moral qualities can sometimes also be aesthetic qualities [Jacobson,D]
We can judge art ethically, or rate its ethical influence, or assess its quality via its ethics [Jacobson,D]
Good ethics counts towards aesthetic merit, and bad ethics counts against it [Gaut]
Good art does not necessarily improve people (any more than good advice does) [Gaut]
If we don't respond ethically in the way a work prescribes, that is an aesthetic failure [Gaut]
'Moralism' says all aesthetic merits are moral merits [Gaut]
A work can be morally and artistically excellent, despite rejecting moral truth [John,E]
The works we value most are in sympathy with our own moral views [John,E]
We should understand what is morally important in a story, without having to endorse it [John,E]
We value morality in art because that is what we care about - but it is a contingent fact [John,E]
If the depiction of evil is glorified, that is an artistic flaw [Davies,S]
It is an artistic defect if excessive moral outrage distorts the story, and narrows our sympathies [Davies,S]
Immorality may or may not be an artistic defect [Davies,S]
A work which seeks approval for immorality, but alienates the audience, is a failure [Davies,S]