more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20426

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / C. Artistic Issues / 7. Art and Morality ]

Full Idea

To the pure moralist, accepting nothing but ethical values, to be justified, the life of the imagination must be shown not only not to hinder but actually to forward right action, otherwise it is not only useless but, by absorbing energies, harmful.

Gist of Idea

For pure moralists art must promote right action, and not just be harmless

Source

Roger Fry (An Essay in Aesthetics [1909], p.26)

Book Ref

Fry,Roger: 'Vision and Design' [Penguin 1937], p.26


A Reaction

I think this is the sort of attitude you find in Samuel Johnson. Puritans even reject light music, which seems pleasantly harmless to the rest of us. 'Absorbing energies' doesn't sound much of an objection, and may not be the actual objection.


The 11 ideas from 'An Essay in Aesthetics'

If graphic arts only aim at imitation, their works are only trivial ingenious toys [Fry]
Imaginative life requires no action, so new kinds of perception and values emerge in art [Fry]
In the cinema the emotions are weaker, but much clearer than in ordinary life [Fry]
For pure moralists art must promote right action, and not just be harmless [Fry]
Popular opinion favours realism, yet most people never look closely at anything! [Fry]
Everyone reveals an aesthetic attitude, looking at something which only exists to be seen [Fry]
Most of us are too close to our own motives to understand them [Fry]
In life we neglect 'cosmic emotion', but it matters, and art brings it to the fore [Fry]
Art needs a mixture of order and variety in its sensations [Fry]
'Beauty' can either mean sensuous charm, or the aesthetic approval of art (which may be ugly) [Fry]
When viewing art, rather than flowers, we are aware of purpose, and sympathy with its creator [Fry]