more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20433

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 4. Beauty ]

Full Idea

There is an apparent contradiction between two distinct uses of the word 'beauty', one for that which has sensuous charm, and one for the aesthetic approval of works of imaginative art where the objects presented to us are often of extreme ugliness.

Gist of Idea

'Beauty' can either mean sensuous charm, or the aesthetic approval of art (which may be ugly)

Source

Roger Fry (An Essay in Aesthetics [1909], p.33)

Book Ref

Fry,Roger: 'Vision and Design' [Penguin 1937], p.33


A Reaction

The gouging of eyes in 'King Lear' was always the big problem case for aesthetics, just as nowadays it is Marcel Duchamp's wretched 'Fountain'.


The 11 ideas from 'An Essay in Aesthetics'

If graphic arts only aim at imitation, their works are only trivial ingenious toys [Fry]
Imaginative life requires no action, so new kinds of perception and values emerge in art [Fry]
In the cinema the emotions are weaker, but much clearer than in ordinary life [Fry]
For pure moralists art must promote right action, and not just be harmless [Fry]
Popular opinion favours realism, yet most people never look closely at anything! [Fry]
Everyone reveals an aesthetic attitude, looking at something which only exists to be seen [Fry]
Most of us are too close to our own motives to understand them [Fry]
In life we neglect 'cosmic emotion', but it matters, and art brings it to the fore [Fry]
Art needs a mixture of order and variety in its sensations [Fry]
'Beauty' can either mean sensuous charm, or the aesthetic approval of art (which may be ugly) [Fry]
When viewing art, rather than flowers, we are aware of purpose, and sympathy with its creator [Fry]