more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20438

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / B. Nature of Art / 7. Ontology of Art ]

Full Idea

The most miserable performance without actual mistakes does count as an instance of a work, …but the most brilliant performance with a single wrong note does not.

Gist of Idea

A performance is only an instance of a work if there is not a single error

Source

Nelson Goodman (Languages of Art (2nd edn) [1968], p.186), quoted by Alessandro Giovannelli - Nelson Goodman (aesthetics)

Book Ref

'Key Thinkers in Aesthetics', ed/tr. Giovannelli,Alessandro [Continuum 2012], p.174


A Reaction

Mereological essentialism applied to art! You need to be a highly theoretical and technical philosopher (which Goodman was) to maintain such a weird and contrary-usage proposal.

Related Ideas

Idea 15512 In mereology no two things consist of the same atoms [Lewis]

Idea 12875 One false note doesn't make it a performance of a different work [Simons]


The 30 ideas from Nelson Goodman

Goodman argued that the confirmation relation can never be formalised [Goodman, by Horsten/Pettigrew]
Goodman showed that every sound inductive argument has an unsound one of the same form [Goodman, by Putnam]
Dispositions seem more ethereal than behaviour; a non-occult account of them would be nice [Goodman]
We don't use laws to make predictions, we call things laws if we make predictions with them [Goodman]
If the result is bad, we change the rule; if we like the rule, we reject the result [Goodman]
Art is like understanding a natural language, and needs a grasp of a symbol system [Goodman, by Gardner]
Artistic symbols are judged by the fruitfulness of their classifications [Goodman, by Giovannelli]
A performance is only an instance of a work if there is not a single error [Goodman]
A copy only becomes an 'instance' of an artwork if there is a system of notation [Goodman]
Art is a referential activity, hence indefinable, but it has a set of symptoms [Goodman]
Counterfactuals are true if logical or natural laws imply the consequence [Goodman, by McFetridge]
If all and only red things were round things, we would need to specify the 'respect' of the resemblance [Goodman, by Macdonald,C]
Without respects of resemblance, we would collect blue book, blue pen, red pen, red clock together [Goodman, by Macdonald,C]
Two objects can apparently make up quite distinct arrangements in sets [Goodman, by Burgess/Rosen]
If we apply the same word to different things, it is only because we are willing to do so [Goodman, by Macdonald,C]
Classes are a host of ethereal, platonic, pseudo entities [Goodman]
The counties of Utah, and the state, and its acres, are in no way different [Goodman]
If the world is one it has many aspects, and if there are many worlds they will collect into one [Goodman]
We lack frames of reference to transform physics, biology and psychology into one another [Goodman]
Without words or other symbols, we have no world [Goodman]
A world can be full of variety or not, depending on how we sort it [Goodman]
Things can only be judged the 'same' by citing some respect of sameness [Goodman]
Grue and green won't be in the same world, as that would block induction entirely [Goodman]
Being primitive or prior always depends on a constructional system [Goodman]
We build our world, and ignore anything that won't fit [Goodman]
Users of digital thermometers recognise no temperatures in the gaps [Goodman]
Truth is irrelevant if no statements are involved [Goodman]
Reality is largely a matter of habit [Goodman]
We don't recognise patterns - we invent them [Goodman]
Discovery is often just finding a fit, like a jigsaw puzzle [Goodman]