more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20440

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / B. Nature of Art / 1. Defining Art ]

Full Idea

No definition of art is possible (since it is a referential activity), …but the symptoms of art are syntactic density, semantic density, syntactic repleteness, exemplificationality, and multiple and complex reference.

Gist of Idea

Art is a referential activity, hence indefinable, but it has a set of symptoms

Source

Nelson Goodman (Languages of Art (2nd edn) [1968], p.22-255), quoted by Alessandro Giovannelli - Nelson Goodman (aesthetics) 4

Book Ref

'Key Thinkers in Aesthetics', ed/tr. Giovannelli,Alessandro [Continuum 2012], p.178


A Reaction

I wish these labels were more self-explanatory. Goodman seems to want to assimilate art to his earlier interests in linguistic anti-realism and mereology. I wouldn't have thought he now had many followers.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [possibility of a general definition of art]:

Aestheticism invites artist to create beauty, but with no indication of how to do it [Bell,C]
Art is the expression of an emotion for ultimate reality [Bell,C]
Art (like philosophy) establishes a relation between world and self, and between oneself and others [Weil]
Art is a referential activity, hence indefinable, but it has a set of symptoms [Goodman]
We should first decide what are the great works of art, with aesthetic theory following from that [Murdoch]
A criterion of identity for works of art would be easier than a definition [Wollheim]
Early 20th cent attempts at defining art focused on significant form, intuition, expression, unity [Lamarque/Olson]
The idea that art forms are linked into a single concept began in the 1740s [Davies,S]
Defining art as representation or expression or form were all undermined by the avant-garde [Davies,S]
'Aesthetic functionalism' says art is what is intended to create aesthetic experiences [Davies,S]