more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20522

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 4. Property rights ]

Full Idea

A utilitarian justification of property rights says allowing people to appropriate property, trade in it, and leave it to their descendants will encourage them to make the most productive use of their resources.

Gist of Idea

Utilitarians might say property ownership encourages the best use of the land

Source

Jonathan Wolff (An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev) [2006], 5 'Locke')

Book Ref

Wolff,Jonathan: 'An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Rev)' [OUP 2006], p.143


A Reaction

This obviously has a point, but equally justifies confiscation of land from people who are not making best use of it. In Sicily many landowners refused to allow the peasants to make any use at all of the land.


The 32 ideas from Jonathan Wolff

A realistic and less utopian anarchism looks increasingly like liberal democracy [Wolff,J]
It is hard for anarchists to deny that we need experts [Wolff,J]
Human beings can never really flourish in a long-term state of nature [Wolff,J]
Collective rationality is individuals doing their best, assuming others all do the same [Wolff,J]
Following some laws is not a moral matter; trivial traffic rules, for example [Wolff,J]
For utilitarians, consent to the state is irrelevant, if it produces more happiness [Wolff,J]
Social contract theory has the attracton of including everyone, and being voluntary [Wolff,J]
Maybe voting in elections is a grant of legitimacy to the winners [Wolff,J]
A system of democracy which includes both freedom and equality is almost impossible [Wolff,J]
Democracy expresses equal respect (which explains why criminals forfeit the vote) [Wolff,J]
Democracy has been seen as consistent with many types of inequality [Wolff,J]
A true democracy could not tolerate slavery, exploitation or colonialism [Wolff,J]
How can dictators advance the interests of the people, if they don't consult them about interests? [Wolff,J]
Political equality is not much use without social equality [Wolff,J]
Occasional defeat is acceptable, but a minority that is continually defeated is a problem [Wolff,J]
'Separation of powers' allows legislative, executive and judicial functions to monitor one another [Wolff,J]
We can see the 'general will' as what is in the general interest [Wolff,J]
We should decide whether voting is for self-interests, or for the common good [Wolff,J]
Condorcet proved that sensible voting leads to an emphatically right answer [Wolff,J]
If rights are natural, rather than inferred, how do we know which rights we have? [Wolff,J]
Standard rights: life, free speech, assembly, movement, vote, stand (plus shelter, food, health?) [Wolff,J]
If natural rights are axiomatic, there is then no way we can defend them [Wolff,J]
Liberty principles can't justify laws against duelling, incest between siblings and euthanasia [Wolff,J]
Utilitarians argue for equal distribution because of diminishing utility of repetition [Wolff,J]
Utilitarianism probably implies a free market plus welfare [Wolff,J]
Difference Principle: all inequalities should be in favour of the disadvantaged [Wolff,J]
Political choice can be by utility, or maximin, or maximax [Wolff,J]
Market prices indicate shortages and gluts, and where the profits are to be made [Wolff,J]
Utilitarians might say property ownership encourages the best use of the land [Wolff,J]
Either Difference allows unequal liberty, or Liberty makes implementing Difference impossible [Wolff,J]
Rights and justice are only the last resorts of a society, something to fall back on [Wolff,J]
Should love be the first virtue of a society, as it is of the family? [Wolff,J]