more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20561

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 5. Democracy / a. Nature of democracy ]

Full Idea

If there were moral knowledge about political matters, democracy would be a very strange way of reaching it. Democratic law-making means treating each person's view as equally good, which only makes sense if there is nothing to be right or wrong about.

Gist of Idea

Since all opinions are treated as equal in democracy, it implies there are no right answers

Source

Adam Swift (Political Philosophy (3rd ed) [2014], 5 'Subjectivism')

Book Ref

Swift,Adam: 'Political Philosophy (3rd edn)' [Polity 2014], p.209


A Reaction

Ah, I suddenly grasp that the modern fad for a rather gormless blanket relativism is rooted in the modern desire to take democracy really seriously. Important to remember Condorcet's point here.

Related Idea

Idea 20499 Condorcet proved that sensible voting leads to an emphatically right answer [Wolff,J]


The 24 ideas from 'Political Philosophy (3rd ed)'

The best way to build a cohesive community is to be involved in a war [Swift]
Justice can be seen as fairness or entitlement or desert [Swift]
Redistributing wealth treats some people as means, rather than as ends [Swift]
You can't necessarily sell your legitimate right to something, even if you produced it [Swift]
Inequalities are needed, as incentives to do the most important jobs [Swift]
Isn't it more rational to maximise the average position, but with a safety net? [Swift]
Hypothetical contracts have no binding force [Swift]
Cosmopolitans reject the right of different states to distribute resources in different ways [Swift]
Libertarians about property ignore the fact that private property is a denial of freedoms [Swift]
We should respect the right of people to live in their own way, even if it is irrational [Swift]
Maybe a freedom is from a restraint, and also in order to do something [Swift]
Opportunity should ignore extraneous factors, or foster competence, or ignore all disadvantages [Swift]
Men have had the power to structure all of our social institutions [Swift]
A person can desire redistibution of wealth, without it being for reasons of equality [Swift]
Membership and inclusion in a community implies non-membership and exclusion [Swift]
Liberals mistakenly think individuals choose their values, without reference to the community [Swift]
Liberals are concerned to protect individuals from too much community [Swift]
Multiculturalism is a barrier to the whole state being a community [Swift]
Anti-colonial movements usually invoke the right of their 'people' to self-determination [Swift]
Democracy is bad, but the other systems are worse [Swift]
Teledemocracy omits debate and deliberation, which are important parts of good decisions [Swift]
Since all opinions are treated as equal in democracy, it implies there are no right answers [Swift]
Design your democracy to treat citizens equally, or to produce better citizens? [Swift]
Design your democracy to yield political stability, or good decisions? [Swift]