more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 20599

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 5. Democracy / b. Consultation ]

Full Idea

A major question for democracy is how are the contributions of different people aggregated into a collective decision? Must votes have equal weight and consideration, or is it permissible for different people's votes to count differently?

Gist of Idea

How should democratic votes be aggregated? Can some person's votes count for more?

Source

Tuckness,A/Wolf,C (This is Political Philosophy [2017], 5 'What is')

Book Ref

Tuckness,A / Wolf,C: 'This is Political Philosophy' [Wiley Blackwell 2017], p.108

A Reaction

Mill hoped that wise and knowledgeable people would have a strong influence over the others, but we have recently moved into the post-truth era, where we are swamped by bogus facts. Does that strengthen the case for elite voting?

Related Ideas

Idea 20598 In a democracy, which 'people' are included in the decision process? [Tuckness/Wolf]

Idea 20560 Teledemocracy omits debate and deliberation, which are important parts of good decisions [Swift]

The 23 ideas with the same theme [government's consultation, by plebiscite or election]:

1566 The first priority in elections is to vote for people who support democracy [Anon (Diss)]
19965 The fundamental laws of a democracy decide who can vote [Montesquieu]
19968 It is basic to a democracy that the people themselves must name their ministers [Montesquieu]
19969 Voting should be public, so the lower classes can be influenced by the example of notable people [Montesquieu]
19999 All citizens (apart from the very humble poor) should choose their representatives [Montesquieu]
19748 Plebiscites are bad, because they exclude the leaders from crucial decisions [Rousseau]
7243 Silence of the people implies their consent [Rousseau]
19832 Democratic elections are dangerous intervals in government [Rousseau]
22800 Majority rule means obligations can be imposed on me [Hegel]
21792 The state should reflect all interests, and not just popular will, or a popular party [Hegel, by Houlgate]
20508 How people vote should be on public record, so they can be held accountable [Mill, by Wolff,J]
20507 Voting is a strict duty, like jury service, and must only be aimed at the public good [Mill]
22678 An election, and its lead up time, are always a national crisis [Tocqueville]
14846 If we want the good life for the greatest number, we must let them decide on the good life [Nietzsche]
20498 We should decide whether voting is for self-interests, or for the common good [Wolff,J]
20499 Condorcet proved that sensible voting leads to an emphatically right answer [Wolff,J]
20979 Democracy needs more than some institutions; diverse sections of the people must be heard [Sen]
20999 Democracy as 'government by discussion' now has wide support [Sen]
20095 A referendum result arises largely from ignorance [Reybrouck]
20609 If several losing groups would win if they combine, a runoff seems called for [Tuckness/Wolf]
20605 Rights as interests (unlike rights as autonomy) supports mandatory voting [Tuckness/Wolf]
20599 How should democratic votes be aggregated? Can some person's votes count for more? [Tuckness/Wolf]
20601 Discussion before voting should be an essential part of democracy [Tuckness/Wolf]