more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 20728
[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 2. Possibility of Metaphysics
]
Full Idea
Despair over metaphysics will not change until it has shaken off the incubus of a perverted epistemology, which has left thought in a hopeless tangle - until common-sense critical realism is made the starting point for investigating reality.
Gist of Idea
Metaphysics is hopeless with its present epistemology; common-sense realism is needed
Source
Stephen S. Colvin (The Common-Sense View of Reality [1902], p.144)
Book Ref
-: 'Philosophical Review' [-], p.144
A Reaction
It seems to me that this is what has happened to analytic metaphysics since Kripke. Careful discussions about the nature of an object, or a category, or a property, are relying on unquestioned robust realism. Quite right too.
Related Idea
Idea 20727
Common-sense realism rests on our interests and practical life [Colvin]
The
18 ideas
with the same theme
[possibility of abstract wisdom through pure thought]:
7918
|
Kant turned metaphysics into epistemology, ignoring Aristotle's 'being qua being'
[Kant, by Macdonald,C]
|
21438
|
Metaphysics might do better to match objects to our cognition (and not start with the objects)
[Kant]
|
16611
|
You just can't stop metaphysical speculation, in any mature mind
[Kant]
|
5586
|
The voyage of reason may go only as far as the coastline of experience reaches
[Kant]
|
8107
|
The love of certainty holds us back in metaphysics
[Joubert]
|
15612
|
Older metaphysics naively assumed that thought grasped things in themselves
[Hegel]
|
7080
|
Metaphysics divided the old unified Greek world into two
[Nietzsche, by Critchley]
|
20728
|
Metaphysics is hopeless with its present epistemology; common-sense realism is needed
[Colvin]
|
5432
|
Metaphysics cannot give knowledge of the universe as a whole
[Russell]
|
13939
|
No possible evidence could decide the reality of numbers, so it is a pseudo-question
[Carnap]
|
16395
|
Kripke separated semantics from metaphysics, rather than linking them, making the latter independent
[Kripke, by Stalnaker]
|
12771
|
Is it likely that a successful, coherent, explanatory ontological hypothesis is true?
[Fraassen]
|
12027
|
There must be a plausible epistemological theory alongside any metaphysical theory
[Forbes,G]
|
15053
|
If metaphysics can't be settled, it hardly matters whether it makes sense
[Fine,K]
|
18506
|
Questions of explanation should not be confused with metaphyics
[Heil]
|
14721
|
Metaphysical enquiry can survive if its conclusions are tentative
[Sider]
|
15010
|
Your metaphysics is 'cheating' if your ontology won't support the beliefs you accept
[Sider]
|
14912
|
There is no test for metaphysics, except devising alternative theories
[Ladyman/Ross]
|