more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20733

[filed under theme 23. Ethics / F. Existentialism / 5. Existence-Essence ]

Full Idea

'Existence precedes essence' means there is no pre-given 'essence' that determines who and what we are. We are self-making beings.

Gist of Idea

Our 'existence' is how we create ourselves, unconstrained by any prior 'essence'

Source

Kevin Aho (Existentialism: an introduction [2014], Pref 'What?)

Book Ref

Aho,Kevin: 'Existentialism: an introduction' [Polity 2014], p.-8


A Reaction

This not a yes/no dilemma. Personally I believe (with Aristotle, and Steven Pinker) that there is a fairly comprehensive 'human nature' which we all share, and is the basis of ethics. On top of that, though, a fair bit of 'self-making' can go on.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [natures as either malleable or fixed in character]:

Essence must be known before we discuss existence [Descartes]
For Kant, essence is mental and a mere idea, and existence is the senses and mere appearance [Kant, by Feuerbach]
Reason is just abstractions, so our essence needs a subjective 'leap of faith' [Kierkegaard, by Scruton]
Over huge periods of time human character would change endlessly [Nietzsche]
It is absurd to think you can change your own essence, like a garment [Nietzsche]
Being what it is (essentia) must be conceived in terms of Being (existence) [Heidegger]
'Existence precedes essence' means we have no pre-existing self, but create it through existence [Sartre, by Le Poidevin]
Existence before essence (or begin with the subjective) [Sartre]
Existentialism may transcend our nature, unlike eudaimonism [Graham]
Our 'existence' is how we create ourselves, unconstrained by any prior 'essence' [Aho]