more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 2081

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / a. Foundationalism ]

Full Idea

Maybe the primary elements of which things are composed are not susceptible to rational accounts. Each of them taken by itself can only be named, but nothing further can be said about it.

Gist of Idea

Maybe primary elements can be named, but not receive a rational account

Source

Plato (Theaetetus [c.368 BCE], 201e)

Book Ref

Plato: 'Theaetetus', ed/tr. Waterfield,Robin [Penguin 1987], p.116


A Reaction

This still seems to be more or less the central issue in philosophy - which things should be treated as 'primitive', and which other things are analysed and explained using the primitive tools?


The 33 ideas from 'Theaetetus'

Perception is infallible, suggesting that it is knowledge [Plato]
What evidence can be brought to show whether we are dreaming or not? [Plato]
It is impossible to believe something which is held to be false [Plato]
Eristic discussion is aggressive, but dialectic aims to help one's companions in discussion [Plato]
If you claim that all beliefs are true, that includes beliefs opposed to your own [Plato]
Clearly some people are superior to others when it comes to medicine [Plato]
Philosophers are always switching direction to something more interesting [Plato]
There must always be some force of evil ranged against good [Plato]
God must be the epitome of goodness, and we can only approach a divine state by being as good as possible [Plato]
How can a relativist form opinions about what will happen in the future? [Plato]
There seem to be two sorts of change: alteration and motion [Plato]
Our senses could have been separate, but they converge on one mind [Plato]
With what physical faculty do we perceive pairs of opposed abstract qualities? [Plato]
Thought must grasp being itself before truth becomes possible [Plato]
How can a belief exist if its object doesn't exist? [Plato]
You might mistake eleven for twelve in your senses, but not in your mind [Plato]
We master arithmetic by knowing all the numbers in our soul [Plato]
Things are only knowable if a rational account (logos) is possible [Plato]
Maybe primary elements can be named, but not receive a rational account [Plato]
A rational account is essentially a weaving together of things with names [Plato]
A primary element has only a name, and no logos, but complexes have an account, by weaving the names [Plato]
The whole can't be the parts, because it would be all of the parts, which is the whole [Plato]
A sum is that from which nothing is lacking, which is a whole [Plato]
Either a syllable is its letters (making parts as knowable as whole) or it isn't (meaning it has no parts) [Plato]
If a word has no parts and has a single identity, it turns out to be the same kind of thing as a letter [Plato]
Parts and wholes are either equally knowable or equally unknowable [Plato]
Understanding mainly involves knowing the elements, not their combinations [Plato]
A rational account might be seeing an image of one's belief, like a reflection in a mirror [Plato]
A rational account of a wagon would mean knowledge of its hundred parts [Plato]
Expertise is knowledge of the whole by means of the parts [Plato]
An inadequate rational account would still not justify knowledge [Plato]
A rational account involves giving an image, or analysis, or giving a differentiating mark [Plato]
Without distinguishing marks, how do I know what my beliefs are about? [Plato]