more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 20835

[filed under theme 16. Persons / F. Free Will / 6. Determinism / a. Determinism ]

Full Idea

Chrysippus's accounts of possibility and fate are in conflict. If he is right that 'everything that permits of occurring even if it is not going to occur is possible', then many things are possible which are not according to fate.

Gist of Idea

Chrysippus is wrong to believe in non-occurring future possibilities if he is a fatalist

Source

comment on Chrysippus (fragments/reports [c.240 BCE]) by Plutarch - 70: Stoic Self-contradictions 1055e

Book Ref

'The Stoics Reader', ed/tr. Inwood,B/Gerson,L.P. [Hackett 2008], p.104


A Reaction

A palpable hit, I think. Plutarch refers to Chrysippus's rejection of Diodorus Cronus's Master Argument. Fatalism seems to entail that the only future possibilities are the ones that actually occur.

Related Idea

Idea 20832 The Master Argument seems to prove that only what will happen is possible [Diod.Cronus, by Epictetus]


The 30 ideas with the same theme [natural causes have no room for free will]:

Democritus said atoms only move by their natural motions, which are therefore necessary [Democritus, by Cicero]
Democritus said everything happens of necessity, by natural motion of atoms [Democritus, by Cicero]
Some say there is a determinate cause for every apparently spontaneous event [Democritus, by Aristotle]
No one wants to be bad, but bad men result from physical and educational failures, which they do not want or choose [Plato]
If everything is by necessity, then even denials of necessity are by necessity [Epicurus]
When a slave said 'It was fated that I should steal', Zeno replied 'Yes, and that you should be beaten' [Zeno of Citium, by Diog. Laertius]
A dog tied to a cart either chooses to follow and is pulled, or it is just pulled [Zeno of Citium, by Hippolytus]
Chrysippus is wrong to believe in non-occurring future possibilities if he is a fatalist [Plutarch on Chrysippus]
Everything is fated, either by continuous causes or by a supreme rational principle [Chrysippus, by Diog. Laertius]
Some actions are within our power; determinism needs prior causes for everything - so it is false [Carneades, by Cicero]
Whoever knows future causes knows everything that will be [Cicero]
If we could foresee the future, we should collaborate with disease and death [Epictetus]
If the future does not exist, how can prophets see it? [Augustine]
Does foreknowledge cause necessity, or necessity cause foreknowledge? [Boethius]
God's universal foreknowledge seems opposed to free will [Boethius]
We think we are free because we don't know the causes of our desires and choices [Spinoza]
The actual world is the only one God could have created [Spinoza]
People argue for God's free will, but it isn't needed if God acts in perfection following supreme reason [Leibniz]
We think we are free because the causes of the will are unknown; determinism is a false problem [Leibniz]
If a supreme intellect knew all atoms and movements, it could know all of the past and the future [Laplace]
We don't control our own thinking [Schopenhauer]
Man's actions are not free, because they follow strictly from impact of motive on character [Schopenhauer]
People used to think that outcomes were from God, rather than consequences of acts [Nietzsche]
That all events are necessary does not mean they are compelled [Nietzsche]
To believe in determinism, one must believe in a system which determines events [Anscombe]
Determinism threatens free will if actions can be causally traced to external factors [Foot]
Determinism says there can't be two identical worlds up to a time, with identical laws, which then differ [Lewis]
Every event having a cause, and every event being determined by its cause, are not the same [Scruton]
Two versions of quantum theory say that the world is deterministic [Ladyman/Ross]
There once was a man who said 'Damn!... [Sommers,W]