more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21043

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / D. Justice / 1. Basis of justice ]

Full Idea

Debates about distributive justice are about not only who gets what but also what qualities are worthy of honour and reward.

Gist of Idea

Distributive justice concern deserts, as well as who gets what

Source

Michael J. Sandel (Justice: What's the right thing to do? [2009], 07)

Book Ref

Sandel,Michael J.: 'Justice: what's the right thing to do?' [Penguin 2010], p.179


A Reaction

So the 'undeserving poor' get nuffink? Does just being a human being deserve anything? Obviously yes. That said, we can't deny the concept of 'appropriate reward'.


The 19 ideas from 'Justice: What's the right thing to do?'

We can approach justice through welfare, or freedom, or virtue [Sandel]
Justice concerns how a society distributes what it prizes - wealth, rights, power and honours [Sandel]
Speak truth only to those who deserve the truth [Sandel]
Careful evasions of truth at least show respect for it [Sandel]
The categorical imperative is not the Golden Rule, which concerns contingent desires [Sandel]
Man cannot dispose of himself, because he is not a thing to be owned [Sandel]
A just constitution harmonises the different freedoms [Sandel]
Just visiting (and using roads) is hardly ratifying the Constitution [Sandel]
A ratified constitution may not be a just constitution [Sandel]
Does consent create the obligation, or must there be some benefit? [Sandel]
Moral contracts involve both consent and reciprocity; making the deal, and keeping it [Sandel]
Not all deals are fair deals [Sandel]
Libertarians just want formal equality in a free market; the meritocratic view wants fair equality [Sandel]
Should we redress wrongs done by a previous generation? [Sandel]
Distributive justice concern deserts, as well as who gets what [Sandel]
Work is not fair if it is negotiated, even in a fair situation, but if it suits the nature of the worker [Sandel]
Teleological thinking is essential for social and political issues [Sandel]
Liberal freedom was a response to assigned destinies like caste and class [Sandel]
Justice is about how we value things, and not just about distributions [Sandel]