more on this theme
|
more from this text
Single Idea 21051
[filed under theme 23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 3. Universalisability
]
Full Idea
To check whether we are following public reason we might ask: how would our argument strike us presented in the form of a supreme court opinion?
Gist of Idea
Check your rationality by thinking of your opinion pronounced by the supreme court
Source
John Rawls (Political Liberalism [1993], p.254), quoted by Michael J. Sandel - Justice: What's the right thing to do? 10
Book Ref
Sandel,Michael J.: 'Justice: what's the right thing to do?' [Penguin 2010], p.249
A Reaction
A very nice practical implementation of Kantian universalisability. How would your opinion sound if it were written into a constitution?
The
19 ideas
from John Rawls
22406
|
The maximisation of happiness must be done fairly
[Rawls, by Smart]
|
21137
|
Rawls rejected cosmopolitanism because it doesn't respect the autonomy of 'peoples'
[Rawls, by Shorten]
|
23420
|
In a pluralist society we can't expect a community united around one conception of the good
[Rawls]
|
21119
|
Power is only legitimate if it is reasonable for free equal citizens to endorse the constitution
[Rawls]
|
21051
|
Check your rationality by thinking of your opinion pronounced by the supreme court
[Rawls]
|
15676
|
Rawls defends the priority of right over good
[Rawls, by Finlayson]
|
4123
|
A fair arrangement is one that parties can agree to without knowing how it will benefit them personally
[Rawls, by Williams,B]
|
3280
|
Why does the rational agreement of the 'Original Position' in Rawls make it right?
[Nagel on Rawls]
|
20552
|
The original position models the idea that citizens start as free and equal
[Rawls, by Swift]
|
20538
|
Utilitarians lump persons together; Rawls somewhat separates them; Nozick wholly separates them
[Swift on Rawls]
|
9277
|
Rawls's account of justice relies on conventional fairness, avoiding all moral controversy
[Gray on Rawls]
|
21018
|
The social contract has problems with future generations, national boundaries, disabilities and animals
[Rawls, by Nussbaum]
|
18636
|
Choose justice principles in ignorance of your own social situation
[Rawls]
|
18631
|
All desirable social features should be equal, unless inequality favours the disadvantaged
[Rawls]
|
21041
|
Justice concerns not natural distributions, or our born location, but what we do about them
[Rawls]
|
20527
|
Liberty Principle: everyone has an equal right to liberties, if compatible with others' liberties
[Rawls]
|
23110
|
Human injustice is not a permanent feature of communities
[Rawls]
|
23583
|
If an aggression is unjust, the constraints on how it is fought are much stricter
[Rawls]
|
3279
|
Utilitarianism inappropriately scales up the individual willingness to make sacrifices
[Rawls, by Nagel]
|