more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21061

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 2. Happiness / c. Value of happiness ]

Full Idea

My conception of duty does not need to be based on any particular end, but rather itself occasions a new end for the human will, that of striving with all one's power towards the highest good possible on earth, the universal happiness of the whole world.

Gist of Idea

Duty does not aim at an end, but gives rise to universal happiness as aim of the will

Source

Immanuel Kant (True in Theory, but not in Practice [1792], 1B)

Book Ref

Kant,Immanuel: 'Political Writings', ed/tr. Reiss,Hans [CUP 1996], p.65


A Reaction

I see nothing in the categorical imperative that demands 'all one's power', and nothing that specifies happiness as what has to be universalised. Nietzsche, for one, thinks happiness is overrated.


The 14 ideas from 'True in Theory, but not in Practice'

It can't be a duty to strive after the impossible [Kant]
General rules of action also need a judgement about when to apply them [Kant]
Duty does not aim at an end, but gives rise to universal happiness as aim of the will [Kant]
The will's motive is the absolute law itself, and moral feeling is receptivity to law [Kant]
A lawful civil state must embody freedom, equality and independence for its members [Kant]
Personal contracts are for some end, but a civil state contract involves a duty to share [Kant]
Citizens can rise to any rank that talent, effort and luck can achieve [Kant]
You can't make a contract renouncing your right to make contracts! [Kant]
There must be a unanimous contract that citizens accept majority decisions [Kant]
A citizen must control his own life, and possess property or an important skill [Kant]
A contract is theoretical, but it can guide rulers to make laws which the whole people will accept [Kant]
There can be no restraints on freedom if reason does not reveal some basic rights [Kant]
A law is unjust if the whole people could not possibly agree to it [Kant]
The people (who have to fight) and not the head of state should declare a war [Kant]