more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 2109

[filed under theme 15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 3. Privacy ]

Full Idea

If a conscious machine were increased in size, one might enter it like a mill, but we should only see the parts impinging on one another; we should not see anything which would explain a perception.

Gist of Idea

Increase a conscious machine to the size of a mill - you still won't see perceptions in it

Source

Gottfried Leibniz (Monadology [1716], §17)

Book Ref

Leibniz,Gottfried: 'Philosophical Writings', ed/tr. Parkinson,G.H.R. [Dent 1973], p.181


A Reaction

A wonderful image for capturing a widely held intuition. It seems to motivate Colin McGinn's 'Mysterianism'. The trouble is Leibniz didn't think big/small enough. Down at the level of molecules it might become obvious what a perception is. 'Might'.

Related Idea

Idea 7522 A full neural account of qualia will give new epistemic access to them, beyond private experience [Churchlands]


The 9 ideas with the same theme [exceptionally private nature of thought]:

Increase a conscious machine to the size of a mill - you still won't see perceptions in it [Leibniz]
If a lion could talk, it would be nothing like other lions [Dennett on Wittgenstein]
If a lion could talk, we could not understand him [Wittgenstein]
We can know a lot of what it is like to be a bat, and nothing important is unknown [Dennett]
A full neural account of qualia will give new epistemic access to them, beyond private experience [Churchlands]
Dualist privacy is seen as too deep for even telepathy to reach [Rey]
Only you can have your subjective experiences because only you are hooked up to your nervous system [Flanagan]
Nothing in physics even suggests consciousness [Chalmers]
We could know what a lion thinks by mapping both its brain patterns and its experiences [Douglas,A]