more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21271

[filed under theme 28. God / B. Proving God / 3. Proofs of Evidence / a. Cosmological Proof ]

Full Idea

That which can not-be at some time is not. So if everything can not-be, then once there was nothing in existence. If so, it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist. So there must be some being having of itself its own necessity.

Gist of Idea

Way 3: contingent beings eventually vanish, so continuity needs a necessary being

Source

Thomas Aquinas (Summa Theologicae [1265], Ia,Q02,Art3,Reply)

Book Ref

'The Existence of God', ed/tr. Hick,John [Macmillan 1964], p.84


A Reaction

[compressed] Why can't things take it in turns to not-be, so that something is always on duty? Maybe it is a feature of things that they bring other things into existence (e.g. virtual particles)?


The 21 ideas with the same theme [existence of nature proves God exists]:

Brahman is the Uncaused Cause [Anon (Upan)]
Self-generating motion is clearly superior to all other kinds of motion [Plato]
The only possible beginning for the endless motions of reality is something self-generated [Plato]
Self-moving soul has to be the oldest thing there is [Plato]
If matter wasn't everlasting, everything would have disappeared by now [Lucretius]
The power through which creation remains in existence and motion I call 'God' [Boethius]
If you assume that there must be a necessary being, you can't say which being has this quality [Kant on Aquinas]
Way 1: the infinite chain of potential-to-actual movement has to have a first mover [Aquinas]
Way 2: no effect without a cause, and this cannot go back to infinity, so there is First Cause [Aquinas]
Way 3: contingent beings eventually vanish, so continuity needs a necessary being [Aquinas]
Way 4: the source of all qualities is their maximum, so something (God) causes all perfections [Aquinas]
We can't infer the infinity of God from creation ex nihilo [Duns Scotus, by Dumont]
We can't prove a first cause from our inability to grasp infinity [Descartes]
We exist, so there is Being, which requires eternal being [Locke]
Mechanics shows that all motion originates in other motion, so there is a Prime Mover [Leibniz]
The existence of God, and all metaphysics, follows from the Principle of Sufficient Reason [Leibniz]
A chain of events requires a cause for the whole as well as the parts, yet the chain is just a sum of parts [Hume]
If something must be necessary so that something exists rather than nothing, why can't the universe be necessary? [Hume]
If you prove God cosmologically, by a regress in the sequences of causes, you can't abandon causes at the end [Kant]
To know if this world must have been created by God, we would need to know all other possible worlds [Kant]
A distinct cause of the universe can't be material (which would be part of the universe) [Davies,B]