more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21310

[filed under theme 16. Persons / E. Rejecting the Self / 4. Denial of the Self ]

Full Idea

Suppose an oyster to have only one perception, as of thirst or hunger. Do you consider any thing but merely that perception? Have you any notion of self or substance? If not, the addition of other perceptions can never give you that notion.

Gist of Idea

Does an oyster with one perception have a self? Would lots of perceptions change that?

Source

David Hume (Treatise of Human Nature, + Appendix [1740], Appendix)

Book Ref

Hume,David: 'A Treatise of Human Nature', ed/tr. Selby-Bigge/Nidditch [OUP 1978], p.634


A Reaction

A splendid addition to his earlier sceptical thinking. We could form a different conclusion. Suppose I do have a self. If my multitudinous perceptions were reduced to a single perception of agonising pain, would that remove the self?


The 11 ideas from 'Treatise of Human Nature, + Appendix'

Hume needs a notion which includes degrees of resemblance [Shoemaker on Hume]
Causation is just invariance, as long as it is described in general terms [Quine on Hume]
If impressions, memories and ideas only differ in vivacity, nothing says it is memory, or repetition [Whitehead on Hume]
Belief is a feeling, independent of the will, which arises from uncontrolled and unknown causes [Hume]
A proposition cannot be intelligible or consistent, if the perceptions are not so [Hume]
Are self and substance the same? Then how can self remain if substance changes? [Hume]
Perceptions are distinct, so no connection between them can ever be discovered [Hume]
We have no impression of the self, and we therefore have no idea of it [Hume]
Does an oyster with one perception have a self? Would lots of perceptions change that? [Hume]
Experiences are logically separate, but factually linked by simultaneity or a feeling of continuousness [Ayer on Hume]
We have no natural love of mankind, other than through various relationships [Hume]