more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21491

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / C. Powers and Dispositions / 6. Dispositions / d. Dispositions as occurrent ]

Full Idea

The realism about possibilities, generalities, tendencies and habits that we find in Peirce's later maxim is something that the logical positivists would have been uncomfortable with.

Gist of Idea

Peirce's later realism about possibilities and generalities went beyond logical positivism

Source

report of Charles Sanders Peirce (works [1892]) by Albert Atkin - Peirce 2 'Concl'

Book Ref

Atkin,Albert: 'Peirce' [Routledge 2016], p.69


A Reaction

Atkin examines the various later statements of the earlier maxim, given here in Idea 21490. Ryle and Quine express the empiricist and logical positivist approach to dispositions.

Related Ideas

Idea 14297 A dispositional property is not a state, but a liability to be in some state, given a condition [Ryle]

Idea 16945 We judge things to be soluble if they are the same kind as, or similar to, things that do dissolve [Quine]


The 11 ideas with the same theme [dispositions only exist when behaviour occurs]:

The Megarans say something is only capable of something when it is actually doing it [Aristotle]
Megaran actualism is just scepticism about the qualities of things [Aristotle]
Megaran actualists prevent anything from happening, by denying a capacity for it to happen! [Aristotle]
Peirce's later realism about possibilities and generalities went beyond logical positivism [Peirce, by Atkin]
We judge things to be soluble if they are the same kind as, or similar to, things that do dissolve [Quine]
Explain unmanifested dispositions as structural similarities to objects which have manifested them [Quine, by Martin,CB]
What is a field of potentials, if it only consists of possible events? [Harré/Madden]
There doesn't seem to be anything in the actual world that can determine modal facts [Sidelle]
Megarian actualists deny unmanifested dispositions [Bird]
If a disposition is never instantiated, it shouldn't be part of our theory of nature [Corry]
Nomological dispositions (unlike ordinary ones) have to be continually realised [Vetter]