more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21510

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / b. Pro-coherentism ]

Full Idea

Sometimes it is said that if one has an appropriately coherent system, an alternative system can be produced simply be negating all of the components of the first system. This would only be so if coherence amounted simply to consistency.

Gist of Idea

The objection that a negated system is equally coherent assume that coherence is consistency

Source

Laurence Bonjour (The Structure of Empirical Knowledge [1985], 5.5)

Book Ref

Bonjour,Laurence: 'The Structure of Empirical Knowledge' [Harvard 1985], p.107


A Reaction

I associate Russell with this original objection to coherentism. I formerly took this to be a serious problem, and am now relieved to see that it clearly isn't.


The 8 ideas from 'The Structure of Empirical Knowledge'

A coherence theory of justification can combine with a correspondence theory of truth [Bonjour]
Anomalies challenge the claim that the basic explanations are actually basic [Bonjour]
There will always be a vast number of equally coherent but rival systems [Bonjour]
A well written novel cannot possibly match a real belief system for coherence [Bonjour]
The objection that a negated system is equally coherent assume that coherence is consistency [Bonjour]
Empirical coherence must attribute reliability to spontaneous experience [Bonjour]
A coherent system can be justified with initial beliefs lacking all credibility [Bonjour]
The best explanation of coherent observations is they are caused by and correspond to reality [Bonjour]