more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21533

[filed under theme 10. Modality / B. Possibility / 5. Contingency ]

Full Idea

Contingency derives from the fact that a sentence containing a verb in the present tense - or sometimes in the past or the future - changes its meaning continually as the present changes, and stands for different propositions at different times.

Gist of Idea

Contingency arises from tensed verbs changing the propositions to which they refer

Source

Bertrand Russell (Meinong on Complexes and Assumptions [1904], p.26)

Book Ref

Russell,Bertrand: 'Essays in Analysis', ed/tr. Lackey,Douglas [George Braziller 1973], p.26


A Reaction

This immediately strikes me as a bad example of the linguistic approach to philosophy. As if we (like any animal) didn't have an apprehension prior to any language that most parts of experience are capable of change.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [facts which could be otherwise]:

'Contingent' means that the cause is unperceived, not that there is no cause [Hobbes]
Contingency is an illusion, resulting from our inadequate understanding [Spinoza, by Cottingham]
We only call things 'contingent' in relation to the imperfection of our knowledge [Spinoza]
Reason naturally regards things as necessary, and only imagination considers them contingent [Spinoza]
Necessary truths can be analysed into original truths; contingent truths are infinitely analysable [Leibniz]
A reason must be given why contingent beings should exist rather than not exist [Leibniz]
Contingency arises from tensed verbs changing the propositions to which they refer [Russell]
The necessary/contingent distinction may need to recognise possibilities as real [Armstrong]
'Superficial' contingency: false in some world; 'Deep' contingency: no obvious verification [Evans, by Macià/Garcia-Carpentiro]
Possible non-being which must be realised is 'precariousness'; absolute contingency might never not-be [Meillassoux]