more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21713

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / d. Logicism critique ]

Full Idea

It is often thought that Logicism was a failure, because after Frege's contradiction, Russell required obviously nonlogical principles, in order to develop mathematics. The axioms of Reducibility, Infinity and Choice are cited.

Gist of Idea

Did logicism fail, when Russell added three nonlogical axioms, to save mathematics?

Source

Bernard Linsky (Russell's Metaphysical Logic [1999], 6)

Book Ref

Linsky,Bernard: 'Russell's Metaphysical Logic' [CSLI 1999], p.89


A Reaction

Infinity and Choice remain as axioms of the standard ZFC system of set theory, which is why set theory is always assumed to be 'up to its neck' in ontological commitments. Linsky argues that Russell saw ontology in logic.


The 11 ideas from 'Russell's Metaphysical Logic'

'Impredictative' definitions fix a class in terms of the greater class to which it belongs [Linsky,B]
Reducibility says any impredicative function has an appropriate predicative replacement [Linsky,B]
Types are 'ramified' when there are further differences between the type of quantifier and its range [Linsky,B]
The ramified theory subdivides each type, according to the range of the variables [Linsky,B]
Did logicism fail, when Russell added three nonlogical axioms, to save mathematics? [Linsky,B]
For those who abandon logicism, standard set theory is a rival option [Linsky,B]
Extensionalism means what is true of a function is true of coextensive functions [Linsky,B]
Higher types are needed to distinguished intensional phenomena which are coextensive [Linsky,B]
The task of logicism was to define by logic the concepts 'number', 'successor' and '0' [Linsky,B]
Definite descriptions theory eliminates the King of France, but not the Queen of England [Linsky,B]
Construct properties as sets of objects, or say an object must be in the set to have the property [Linsky,B]