more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
The conception of the moral self as characterless leaves only a limited positive role to other people in one's moral life.
Gist of Idea
If the moral self is seen as characterless, then other people have a very limited role in our moral lives
Source
Bernard Williams (Shame and Necessity [1993], IV - p.95)
Book Ref
Williams,Bernard: 'Shame and Necessity' [California 1994], p.95
| 4317 | We judge weakness of will by an assessment after the event is concluded [Williams,B, by Cottingham] |
| 2169 | Greek moral progress came when 'virtue' was freed from social status [Williams,B] |
| 2172 | The modern idea of duty is unknown in archaic Greece [Williams,B] |
| 2174 | Responsibility involves cause, intention, state of mind, and response after the event [Williams,B] |
| 2176 | There is only a problem of free will if you think the notion of 'voluntary' can be metaphysically deepened [Williams,B] |
| 2175 | There is a problem of evil only if you expect the world to be good [Williams,B] |
| 2180 | If reason cannot lead people to good, we must hope they have an internal voice [Williams,B] |
| 2178 | In bad actions, guilt points towards victims, and shame to the agent [Williams,B] |
| 2179 | If the moral self is seen as characterless, then other people have a very limited role in our moral lives [Williams,B] |
| 2181 | It is an absurd Kantian idea that at the limit rationality and freedom coincide [Williams,B] |