more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 21839

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 7. Limitations of Analysis ]

Full Idea

Not reflection, and objections are even worse. Every time someone puts an objection to me, I want to say: 'OK, OK, let's get on to something else'. Objections have never contributed anything.

Gist of Idea

When I meet objections I just move on; they never contribute anything

Source

Gilles Deleuze (A Conversation: what is it? What is it for? [1977], I)

Book Ref

Deleuze,Gilles: 'Dialogues II' [Continuum 2006], p.1


A Reaction

I know it is heresy in analytic philosophy, but I love this! In analytic seminars you can barely complete your first sentence before someone interrupts. It's like road range - the philosophical mind state is always poised to attack, attack.


The 12 ideas from 'A Conversation: what is it? What is it for?'

Philosophy aims to become the official language, supporting orthodoxy and the state [Deleuze]
When I meet objections I just move on; they never contribute anything [Deleuze]
We must create new words, and treat them as normal, and as if designating real things. [Deleuze]
Don't assess ideas for truth or justice; look for another idea, and establish a relationship with it [Deleuze]
Before we seek solutions, it is important to invent problems [Deleuze]
Before Being there is politics [Deleuze]
A meeting of man and animal can be deterritorialization (like a wasp with an orchid) [Deleuze]
People consist of many undetermined lines, some rigid, some supple, some 'lines of flight' [Deleuze]
The history of philosophy is an agent of power: how can you think if you haven't read the great names? [Deleuze]
Thought should be thrown like a stone from a war-machine [Deleuze]
Some lines (of flight) are becomings which escape the system [Deleuze]
Dualisms can be undone from within, by tracing connections, and drawing them to a new path [Deleuze]