more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
In Deleuze's hands ontology is not a matter of telling us what there is, but of taking us on strange adventures.
Gist of Idea
Ontology does not tell what there is; it is just a strange adventure
Source
report of Gilles Deleuze (Difference and Repetition [1968]) by Todd May - Gilles Deleuze 3.03
Book Ref
May,Todd: 'Gilles Deleuze' [CUP 2006], p.86
A Reaction
Presumably you only indulge in the strange adventure because you have no idea how to specify what there is. This sounds like the essence of post-modernism, in which life is just a game.
| 24112 | To think about being we must have an opinion about what it is [Nietzsche] |
| 24131 | There is no 'being'; it is just the opposition to nothingness [Nietzsche] |
| 5657 | Frege's logic showed that there is no concept of being [Frege, by Scruton] |
| 23077 | The word 'being' is very tempting, but in fact means nothing at all [Cioran] |
| 10787 | Is being just referent of the verb 'to be'? [Marcus (Barcan)] |
| 21847 | Before Being there is politics [Deleuze] |
| 21903 | Ontology does not tell what there is; it is just a strange adventure [Deleuze, by May] |
| 21904 | Being is a problem to be engaged, not solved, and needs a new mode of thinking [Deleuze, by May] |
| 12332 | The modern view of Being comes when we reject numbers as merely successions of One [Badiou] |
| 12326 | The primitive name of Being is the empty set; in a sense, only the empty set 'is' [Badiou] |